1.ApplicationNumber: US-1912675926-A
1.PublishNumber: US-1135216-A
2.Date Publish: 19150413
3.Inventor: FREDERICK W. SPANUTIUS

4.Inventor Harmonized: SPANUTIUS FREDERICK W(US)

5.Country: US
6.Claims:

7.Description:
(en)r'nnnEnIckw. srnnnrrns, or HnsrInGs-UroN-HUnson, new, ronx, nssrenon 'ro ran CHEMICAL COMPANY, or HAsrmcs-UPon-HUnson, NEW YonK, A oonrone- TIGN' OF NEW YORK.
PROCESS FOR MAKING A 119E601:ORIZIIEIB.
Ito Drawing.
To all whom it may concern Be it known that l[, FREDERICK W. SPANU- TIUS, of Hastingsvupon-Hudson, in the county of Westchester and State of New York, have invented a new and useful Process for Making a Decolorizer, of which the following is a specification.
My invention relates to the manufacture I of decolorizer and my main object is to provide a decolorizer which is not only superior to those heretofore known but is cheaper to manufacture.
My invention consists mainly in utilizing rectly from the mixture by the introduction of an acid, this rocess being more fully described in U. Letters Patent to Jarrett No. 572345 dated December 1, 1896.
The residue obtained from the filtration step of the above described process is what I use and it is usually inthe formof a filter press cake and usually contains moisture, the remainder bein crude'fiber of the original argols with smal quantities of lime salts and sand. I have-discovered that if this is burned in a closed retort provided with a small opening for the escape of vapor and gases formed ring the carbonization there is obtained upon heating totheproper temperaturev until the'carbonlzation' 1S complete, a residual vegetable charcoal which is s an excellent decolorizer. This residue contains much less of lime salts than bone-black which has heretofore been used, and as it 1s 1 Patented ape. is, rare.
Application filed February 7, 1912. Sena 1N0. emcee.
tirely and easily removed in the ordinary' process of purification of liquors without resorting to extra treatments.
An important advantage is that the product is made from a part of the original tartrate-bearing material and so avoids the introduction of elements and substances forsign to the tartrates or their natural source.
I have found that my process results in a product which is superior in every way to any decolorizer of tartrate solutions heretofore known.
The'cost is very; small when compared to the value as a decolorizer. Furthermore it provides the cheapest and best method of disposal of a residue which has heretofore been hauled off at some expense and this is especially important in a factory at some distance from a garbage dumping ground.
Moreover the gases given off in the retort are not a nuisance because they are combustible and can be entirely consumed in the I furnace itself.
Another advantage in the use of my process is that the expense and dirt connected with handling and grinding the materials "heretofore used is done away with because the product is-made from an article which has already been very finely ground.
The product resulting from my process is primarily for use in decolorizing, purifying and clarifying the solutions extracted from the materials of which the insoluble residue is subjected to my new process.
In the particular case described above I treat by my process the filter press cake from ,argols and lees, the product resulting being used for the decolorization, purificatlon and clarification of liquors used in the production of cream of tartar, Rochelle salts, tartaric acid and such compounds as are made from argols and lees and other crude tartrates and tartaric acid substances.
What I claim is 1. The method of making a decolorizer consisting intreating argols with an alkali,
separating the residue from the solution and heating the; residue until carbonization is complete. p
2. The method of making a decolorizer .con'sistin in dissolving argols in caustic soda, ad ingpotassium chlorid, separating the residue from the solution and heating the residue until carbonization is complete.
3. lhemethod of'making' a decolorizer consisting inftreating argol residue with hot water, separating the solution from the residue which-remains after said treatment and heating said last mentioned residue untilcarbonization is.complete,..
4. The method of consisting infirst placing in a retorta residueconsisting'o-f about 50% moisture and the remainder being crude fiber of argols, lime salts and sand, then heating until carbonizatio'nis com lete allowing the vapor formed to pass 0 during the heating;
5. The method of making a decolorizer consisting in dissolving argols in caustic soda to decompose the coloring matter, or
to render it insoluble, adding a compound making a decolorizer' soda to decompose the coloring matter, or to render it insoluble, introducing carbonate of soda to precipitatethe lime, adding a compound of potassium, and finally heating the residue. until carbonization is complete.
7. As an article of manufacture for de- .-colorizing purposes avegetable charcoal \vhich'is the product resulting from heating the residue extracted from argols consisting of fifty per cent. moisture and fifty per cent. extracted argol residue, from which allbitartrate of potash has been removed and consisting of or anic matter which is almost entirely crude bertogether with sand and earthy salts. k FREDERICK W. SPANUTIUS.
Witnesses HENRY BILLIGMEYER, DANIEL BUCKLEY.