(en)Increasing tolerance to butanol in yeast has been accomplished by decreasing activity of Pdr5p encoded by an endogenous PDR5 gene. A deletion mutation of the PDR5 gene led to improved growth yield in the presence of butanol. Yeast cells with reduced Pdr5p activity, or other multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein activity encoded by CDR1 or BFR1, and a butanol biosynthetic pathway may be used for improved butanol production.

1.ApplicationNumber: US-71130810-A
1.PublishNumber: US-8614085-B2
2.Date Publish: 20131224
3.Inventor: VAN DYK TINA K.

4.Inventor Harmonized: VAN DYK TINA K(US)

5.Country: US
6.Claims:
(en)Increasing tolerance to butanol in yeast has been accomplished by decreasing activity of Pdr5p encoded by an endogenous PDR5 gene. A deletion mutation of the PDR5 gene led to improved growth yield in the presence of butanol. Yeast cells with reduced Pdr5p activity, or other multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein activity encoded by CDR1 or BFR1, and a butanol biosynthetic pathway may be used for improved butanol production.

7.Description:
(en)CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is related to and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/156,067 filed on Feb. 27, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of microbiology and genetic engineering. More specifically, a yeast gene that contributes to the cell response to butanol was identified. This gene may be engineered to improve growth yield in the presence of butanol.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Butanol is an important industrial chemical, useful as a fuel additive, as a feedstock chemical in the plastics industry, and as a foodgrade extractant in the food and flavor industry. Each year 10 to 12 billion pounds of butanol are produced by petrochemical means and the need for this commodity chemical will likely increase.
Butanol may be made through chemical synthesis or by fermentation. Isobutanol is produced biologically as a by-product of yeast fermentation. It is a component of “fusel oil” that forms as a result of incomplete metabolism of amino acids by this group of fungi. Isobutanol is specifically produced from catabolism of L-valine and the yield is typically very low. Additionally, recombinant microbial production hosts, expressing a 1-butanol biosynthetic pathway (Donaldson et al., co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US20080182308A1), a 2-butanol biosynthetic pathway (Donaldson et al., co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Publication Nos. US 20070259410A1 and US 20070292927), and an isobutanol biosynthetic pathway (Maggio-Hall et al., co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Publication No. US 20070092957) have been described.
Biological production of butanols is believed to be limited by butanol toxicity to the host microorganism used in fermentation for butanol production. Yeast are typically sensitive to butanol in the medium. Using a screen for 1-butanol insensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants, Lorenz et al. (Molec. Biol. of the Cell (2000) 11:183-199) identified proteins that regulate polarized growth (BUD8, BEM1, BEM4, and FIG1), mitochondrial function (MSM1, MRP21, and HM11), and a transcriptional regulator (CHD1). They also found that 1-butanol stimulates filamentous growth in haploid cells and induces cell elongation and changes in budding pattern, leading to a pseudohyphal morphology. Ashe et al. (The EMBO Journal (2001) 20:6464-6474) found that butanol brings about a rapid inhibition of translation at the initiation step in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The GCD1-P180 allele has a single amino acid change in Gcd1p, which is part of the eIF2B guanine nucleotide complex that is responsible for recycling eIF2-GDP to eIF2-GTP, that allows translational regulation upon butanol addition. Smirnova et al. (Molecular and Cellular Biology (2005) 25:9340-9340) found by using microarray analysis that with addition of fusel alcohol, there is widespread translational reprogramming in yeast. These studies all indicate the complexity of butanol sensitivity in yeast.
A pleiotropic drug resistant sake yeast with improved fermentative activity was shown to have increased levels of the PDR5 mRNA (Watanabe, M., Mizoguchi, H., and Nishimura, A. (2000) J Biosci Bioeng 89, 569-76).
There remains a need for yeast cells with increased tolerance to butanol, as well as methods of producing butanols using yeast host strains that are more tolerant to these chemicals.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a recombinant yeast cell that is engineered to produce butanol and that is engineered to have decreased activity of a multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein encoded by PDR5, CDR1 or BFR1 genes. This decreased activity confers on the cell increased tolerance to butanol. The present recombinant yeast cell may be used for production of butanol. Butanol refers herein to 1-butanol, 2-butanol, and/or isobutanol.
In one aspect, a recombinant yeast cell comprising at least one genetic modification that reduces Pdr5p activity wherein said yeast cell has improved tolerance to butanol and isomers thereof as compared to a yeast cell that lacks said modification, is provided.
Also provided, is recombinant yeast cell comprising at least one genetic modification that decreases activity of a multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein encoded by a PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 gene wherein said yeast cell has improved tolerance to butanol and isomers thereof as compared to a yeast cell that lacks said modification.
The yeast cells described above may further comprise a butanol biosynthetic pathway. The butanol biosynthetic pathway may be selected from the group consisting of:
a) a 1-butanol biosynthetic pathway
b) a 2-butanol biosynthetic pathway; and
c) an isobutanol biosynthetic pathway.
The yeast cell may have at least about a 1.8-fold improvement in growth yield in 0.75% (w/v) isobutanol as compared to a parental cell that does not have said genetic modification.
The genetic modification may substantially eliminate expression of a multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein encoded by a PDR5, CDR1 or BFR1 gene that is endogenous to the cell.
Also provided is a method for the production of butanol or an isomer thereof comprising growing the yeast cells as described herein under conditions wherein butanol or an isomer thereof is produced and optionally recovering said butanol or isomer thereof. The method is improved by the genetic modifications described herein in that said modifications provide tolerance to butanol.
Also provided is a method for producing a recombinant yeast cell having increased tolerance to butanol comprising:
a) providing a recombinant yeast cell comprising a butanol biosynthetic pathway selected from the group consisting of:
i) a 1-butanol biosynthetic pathway
ii) a 2-butanol biosynthetic pathway; and
iii) an isobutanol biosynthetic pathway; and
b) engineering the yeast cell of (a) to comprise at least one genetic modification which decreases activity of a multidrug resistance ATP-binding cassette transporter protein encoded by a PDR5, CDR1 or BFR1 gene.
SEQUENCE DESCRIPTIONS
The various embodiments of the invention can be more fully understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying sequence descriptions, which form a part of this application.
The following sequences conform with 37C.F.R. 1.821-1.825 (“Requirements for Patent Applications Containing Nucleotide Sequences and/or Amino Acid Sequence Disclosures—the Sequence Rules”) and are consistent with World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standard ST.25 (1998) and the sequence listing requirements of the EPO and PCT (Rules 5.2 and 49.5 (a-bis), and Section 208 and Annex C of the Administrative Instructions). The symbols and format used for nucleotide and amino acid sequence data comply with the rules set forth in 37 C.F.R. §1.822.





TABLE 1



Summary of Coding Region and Protein SEQ ID Numbers for 1-

Butanol Biosynthetic Pathway






SEQ ID NO:
SEQ ID NO:

Description
Nucleic acid
Peptide







Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase thlA from
1
2

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase thlB from
3
4

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase from
39
40


Saccharomyces cerevisiae


3-Hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase
5
6

from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC

824

Crotonase from Clostridium
7
8

acetobutylicum ATCC 824

Putative trans-enoyl CoA reductase from
9
10

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

Butyraldehyde dehydrogenase from
11
12

Clostridium beijerinckii NRRL B594

1-Butanol dehydrogenase bdhB from
13
14

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

1-Butanol dehydrogenase
15
16

bdhA from Clostridium acetobutylicum

ATCC 824


















































TABLE 2



Summary of Coding Region and Protein SEQ ID Numbers for 2-

Butanol Biosynthetic Pathway






SEQ ID NO:
SEQ ID NO:

Description
Nucleic acid
Peptide



budA, acetolactate decarboxylase from
17
18

Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 25955

budB, acetolactate synthase from
19
20

Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 25955

budC, butanediol dehydrogenase from
21
22

Klebsiella pneumoniae IAM1063

pddA, butanediol dehydratase alpha
23
24

subunit from Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC

8724

pddB, butanediol dehydratase beta
25
26

subunit from Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC

8724

pddC, butanediol dehydratase gamma
27
28

subunit from Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC

8724

sadH, 2-butanol dehydrogenase from
29
30

Rhodococcus ruber 219












































TABLE 3



Summary of Coding Region and Protein SEQ ID Numbers for

Isobutanol Biosynthetic Pathway






SEQ ID NO:
SEQ ID NO:

Description
Nucleic acid
Peptide



Klebsiella pneumoniae budB
19
20

(acetolactate synthase)

Bacillus subtilis alsS
41
42

(acetolactate synthase)

E. coli ilvC (acetohydroxy acid
31
32

reductoisomerase)

S. cerevisiae ILV5
43
44

(acetohydroxy acid reductoisomerase)

B. subtilis ilvC (acetohydroxy acid
45
46

reductoisomerase)

E. coli ilvD (acetohydroxy acid
33
34

dehydratase)

S. cerevisiae ILV3
47
48

(Dihydroxyacid dehydratase)

Lactococcus lactis kivD (branched-chain
35
36

α-keto acid decarboxylase), codon

optimized

E. coli yqhD (branched-chain alcohol
37
38

dehydrogenase)














































TABLE 4



Summary of SEQ ID Numbers for multidrug resistance ATP-

binding cassette transporters






SEQ ID NO:
SEQ ID NO:

Organism
Nucleic acid
Peptide



PDR5 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
49
50

CDR1 of Candida albicans
51
52

CDR1 of Candida glabrata
53
54

CDR1 of Pichia stipitis
55
56

CDR1 of Debaryomyces hansenii
57
58

Bfr1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe
59
60




























SEQ ID NO:61 is the nucleotide sequence of the CUP1 promoter.
SEQ ID NO:62 is the nucleotide sequence of the CYC1 terminator.
SEQ ID NO:63 is the nucleotide sequence of the FBA promoter.
SEQ ID NO:64 is the nucleotide sequence of the ADH1 terminator.
SEQ ID NO:65 is the nucleotide sequence of the GPM promoter.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to recombinant yeast cells that are engineered for production of butanol and that additionally are engineered to have decreased activity of a protein encoded by the PDR5 gene (Pdr5p). These yeast cells have increased tolerance to butanol and may be used for production of butanol which is valuable as a fuel or fuel additive to reduce demand for fossil fuels.
The following abbreviations and definitions will be used for the interpretation of the specification and the claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having,” “contains” or “containing,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a composition, a mixture, process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, mixture, process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
Also, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” preceding an element or component of the invention are intended to be nonrestrictive regarding the number of instances (i.e. occurrences) of the element or component. Therefore “a” or “an” should be read to include one or at least one, and the singular word form of the element or component also includes the plural unless the number is obviously meant to be singular.
The term “invention” or “present invention” as used herein is a non-limiting term and is not intended to refer to any single embodiment of the particular invention but encompasses all possible embodiments as described in the specification and the claims.
As used herein, the term “about” modifying the quantity of an ingredient or reactant of the invention employed refers to variation in the numerical quantity that can occur, for example, through typical measuring and liquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutions in the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures; through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredients employed to make the compositions or carry out the methods; and the like. The term “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”, the claims include equivalents to the quantities. In one embodiment, the term “about” means within 10% of the reported numerical value, preferably within 5% of the reported numerical value
The term “butanol” as used herein, refers to 1-butanol, 2-butanol, isobutanol, or mixtures thereof.
The terms “butanol tolerant yeast cell” and “tolerant” when used to describe a modified yeast cell of the invention, refers to a modified yeast that shows better growth in the presence of butanol than the parent strain from which it is derived.
The term “butanol biosynthetic pathway” refers to an enzyme pathway to produce 1-butanol, 2-butanol, or isobutanol.
The term “1-butanol biosynthetic pathway” refers to an enzyme pathway to produce 1-butanol from acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA).
The term “2-butanol biosynthetic pathway” refers to an enzyme pathway to produce 2-butanol from pyruvate.
The term “isobutanol biosynthetic pathway” refers to an enzyme pathway to produce isobutanol from pyruvate.
The term “PDR5” refers to a gene encoding a protein that is a multidrug ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, also called a multidrug efflux pump, that has been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The PDR initials stand for Pleiotropic Drug Resistance. The PDR5 encoded protein Pdr5p is a is designated TC#3.A.1.205.1 in the transporter classification system as given by the Transport Classification Database (M. Saier; U of CA, San Diego). Proteins with the same function as Pdr5p encoded by PDR5 may be referred to in the art as being encoded by genes with other names including STS1, YDR1, LEM1 and YOR153W. The term “Pdr5p” refers herein to any of these encoded proteins that functions similarly to Pdr5p and that has sequence identity to a Pdr5p amino acid sequence that is at least about 75%-80%, 80%-85%, 85%-90%, 90%-95%, or 95%-100%. These genes may or may not be endogenous to the yeast cell.
The term “CDR1” refers to a gene encoding a protein that is a multidrug ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter and multidrug resistance protein that has been identified in Candida albicans and other yeasts. The encoded Cdr1p is designated TC#3.A.1.205.4 in the transporter classification system as given by the Transport Classification Database (M. Saier; U of CA, San Diego). The term Cdr1p refers herein to any protein that functions similarly to Cdr1p of Candida albicans and that has sequence identity to a Cdr1p amino acid sequence that is at least about 75%-80%, 80%-85%, 85%-90%, 90%-95%, or 95%-100%.
The term “BFR1” refers to a gene encoding a protein that is a multidrug ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter and multidrug resistance protein that has been identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe . The encoded Bfr1p is designated TC#3.A.1.205.11 in the transporter classification system as given by the Transport Classification Database (M. Saier; U of CA, San Diego). The term Bfr1p refers herein to any protein that functions similarly to Bfr1p of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and that has sequence identity to S. pombe Bfr1p amino acid sequence that is at least about 75%-80%, 80%-85%, 85%-90%, 90%-95%, or 95%-100%.
The term “acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of two molecules of acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA and coenzyme A (CoA). Preferred acetyl-CoA acetyltransferases are acetyl-CoA acetyltransferases with substrate preferences (reaction in the forward direction) for a short chain acyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA and are classified as E.C. 2.3.1.9 [ Enzyme Nomenclature 1992, Academic Press, San Diego]; although, enzymes with a broader substrate range (E.C. 2.3.1.16) will be functional as well. Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferases are available from a number of sources, for example, Escherichia coli (GenBank Nos: NP — 416728, NC — 000913; NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) amino acid sequence, NCBI nucleotide sequence), Clostridium acetobutylicum (GenBank Nos: NP — 349476.1 (SEQ ID NO:2), NC — 003030; NP — 149242 (SEQ ID NO:4), NC — 001988), Bacillus subtilis (GenBank Nos: NP — 390297, NC — 000964), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (GenBank Nos: NP — 015297, NC — 001148 (SEQ ID NO:39)).
The term “3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of acetoacetyl-CoA to 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA. 3-Hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenases may be reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-dependent, with a substrate preference for (S)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA or (R)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and are classified as E.C. 1.1.1.35 and E.C. 1.1.1.30, respectively. Additionally, 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenases may be reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent, with a substrate preference for (S)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA or (R)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and are classified as E.C. 1.1.1.157 and E.C. 1.1.1.36, respectively. 3-Hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenases are available from a number of sources, for example, C. acetobutylicum (GenBank NOs: NP — 349314 (SEQ ID NO:6), NC — 003030), B. subtilis (GenBank NOs: AAB09614, U29084), Ralstonia eutropha (GenBank NOs: ZP — 0017144, NZ_AADY01000001, Alcaligenes eutrophus (GenBank NOs: YP — 294481, NC — 007347), and A. eutrophus (GenBank NOs: P14697, J04987).
The term “crotonase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and H 2 O. Crotonases may have a substrate preference for (S)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA or (R)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and are classified as E.C. 4.2.1.17 and E.C. 4.2.1.55, respectively. Crotonases are available from a number of sources, for example, E. coli (GenBank NOs: NP — 415911 (SEQ ID NO:8), NC — 000913), C. acetobutylicum (GenBank NOs: NP — 349318, NC — 003030), B. subtilis (GenBank NOs: CAB13705, Z99113), and Aeromonas caviae (GenBank NOs: BAA21816, D88825).
The term “butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase”, also called trans-enoyl CoA reductase, refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of crotonyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA. Butyryl-CoA dehydrogenases may be NADH-dependent or NADPH-dependent and are classified as E.C. 1.3.1.44 and E.C. 1.3.1.38, respectively. Butyryl-CoA dehydrogenases are available from a number of sources, for example, C. acetobutylicum (GenBank NOs: NP — 347102 (SEQ ID NO:10), NC — 003030), Euglena gracilis (GenBank NOs: Q5EU90, AY741582), Streptomyces collinus (Gen Bank NOs: AAA92890, U37135), and Streptomyces coelicolor (GenBank NOs: CAA22721, AL939127).
The term “butyraldehyde dehydrogenase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of butyryl-CoA to butyraldehyde, using NADH or NADPH as cofactor. Butyraldehyde dehydrogenases with a preference for NADH are known as E.C. 1.2.1.57 and are available from, for example, Clostridium beijerinckii (GenBank NOs: AAD31841 (SEQ ID NO:12), AF157306) and C. acetobutylicum (GenBank NOs: NP — 149325, NC — 001988).
The term “1-butanol dehydrogenase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of butyraldehyde to 1-butanol. 1-butanol dehydrogenases are a subset of the broad family of alcohol dehydrogenases. 1-butanol dehydrogenase may be NADH- or NADPH-dependent. 1-butanol dehydrogenases are available from, for example, C. acetobutylicum (GenBank NOs: NP — 149325, NC — 001988; NP — 349891 (SEQ ID NO:14), NC — 003030; and NP — 349892 (SEQ ID NO:16), NC — 003030) and E. coli (GenBank NOs: NP — 417484, NC — 000913).
The term “acetolactate synthase”, also known as “acetohydroxy acid synthase”, refers to a polypeptide (or polypeptides) having an enzyme activity that catalyzes the conversion of two molecules of pyruvic acid to one molecule of alpha-acetolactate. Acetolactate synthase, known as EC 2.2.1.6 [formerly 4.1.3.18] ( Enzyme Nomenclature 1992, Academic Press, San Diego) may be dependent on the cofactor thiamin pyrophosphate for its activity. Suitable acetolactate synthase enzymes are available from a number of sources, for example, Bacillus subtilis (GenBank Nos: AAA22222 NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:42), L04470 NCBI nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO:41)), Klebsiella terrigena (GenBank Nos: AAA25055, L04507), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (GenBank Nos: AAA25079 (SEQ ID NO:20), M73842 (SEQ ID NO:19).
The term “acetolactate decarboxylase” refers to a polypeptide (or polypeptides) having an enzyme activity that catalyzes the conversion of alpha-acetolactate to acetoin. Acetolactate decarboxylases are known as EC 4.1.1.5 and are available, for example, from Bacillus subtilis (GenBank Nos: AAA22223, L04470), Klebsiella terrigena (GenBank Nos: AAA25054, L04507) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (SEQ ID NO:18 (amino acid) SEQ ID NO:17 (nucleotide)).
The term “butanediol dehydrogenase” also known as “acetoin reductase” refers to a polypeptide (or polypeptides) having an enzyme activity that catalyzes the conversion of acetoin to 2,3-butanediol. Butanediol dehydrogenases are a subset of the broad family of alcohol dehydrogenases. Butanediol dehydrogenase enzymes may have specificity for production of R- or S-stereochemistry in the alcohol product. S-specific butanediol dehydrogenases are known as EC 1.1.1.76 and are available, for example, from Klebsiella pneumoniae (GenBank Nos: BBA13085 (SEQ ID NO:22), D86412. R-specific butanediol dehydrogenases are known as EC 1.1.1.4 and are available, for example, from Bacillus cereus (GenBank Nos. NP — 830481, NC — 004722; AAP07682, AE017000), and Lactococcus lactis (GenBank Nos. AAK04995, AE006323).
The term “butanediol dehydratase”, also known as “diol dehydratase” or “propanediol dehydratase” refers to a polypeptide (or polypeptides) having an enzyme activity that catalyzes the conversion of 2,3-butanediol to 2-butanone, also known as methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Butanediol dehydratase may utilize the cofactor adenosyl cobalamin. Adenosyl cobalamin-dependent enzymes are known as EC 4.2.1.28 and are available, for example, from Klebsiella oxytoca (GenBank Nos: BAA08099 (alpha subunit) (SEQ ID NO:24), BAA08100 (beta subunit) (SEQ ID NO:26), and BBA08101 (gamma subunit) (SEQ ID NO:28), (Note all three subunits are required for activity), D45071).
The term “2-butanol dehydrogenase” refers to a polypeptide (or polypeptides) having an enzyme activity that catalyzes the conversion of 2-butanone to 2-butanol. 2-butanol dehydrogenases are a subset of the broad family of alcohol dehydrogenases. 2-butanol dehydrogenase may be NADH- or NADPH-dependent. The NADH-dependent enzymes are known as EC 1.1.1.1 and are available, for example, from Rhodococcus ruber (GenBank Nos: CAD36475 (SEQ ID NO:30), AJ491307 (SEQ ID NO:29)). The NADPH-dependent enzymes are known as EC 1.1.1.2 and are available, for example, from Pyrococcus furiosus (GenBank Nos: AAC25556, AF013169).
The term “acetohydroxy acid isomeroreductase” or “acetohydroxy acid reductoisomerase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of acetolactate to 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate using NADPH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) as an electron donor. Preferred acetohydroxy acid isomeroreductases are known by the EC number 1.1.1.86 and sequences are available from a vast array of microorganisms, including, but not limited to, Escherichia coli (GenBank Nos: NP — 418222 (SEQ ID NO:32), NC — 000913 (SEQ ID NO:31)), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (GenBank Nos: NP — 013459 (SEQ ID NO:44), NC — 001144 (SEQ ID NO:43)), Methanococcus maripaludis (GenBank Nos: CAF30210, BX957220), and Bacillus subtilis (GenBank Nos: CAB14789 (SEQ ID NO:46), Z99118 (SEQ ID NO:45)).
The term “acetohydroxy acid dehydratase” or “dihydroxy acid dehydratase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate to α-ketoisovalerate. Preferred acetohydroxy acid dehydratases are known by the EC number 4.2.1.9. These enzymes are available from a vast array of microorganisms, including, but not limited to, E. coli (GenBank Nos: YP — 026248 (SEQ ID NO:34), NC — 000913 (SEQ ID NO:33)), S. cerevisiae (GenBank Nos: NP — 012550 (SEQ ID NO:48), NC — 001142 (SEQ ID NO:47)), M. maripaludis (GenBank Nos: CAF29874, BX957219), and B. subtilis (GenBank Nos: CAB14105, Z99115).
The term “branched-chain α-keto acid decarboxylase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of α-ketoisovalerate to isobutyraldehyde and CO 2 . Preferred branched-chain α-keto acid decarboxylases are known by the EC number 4.1.1.72 and are available from a number of sources, including, but not limited to, Lactococcus lactis (GenBank Nos: AAS49166, AY548760; CAG34226 (SEQ ID NO:36), AJ746364, Salmonella typhimurium (GenBank Nos: NP — 461346, NC — 003197), and Clostridium acetobutylicum (GenBank Nos: NP — 149189, NC — 001988).
The term “branched-chain alcohol dehydrogenase” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of isobutyraldehyde to isobutanol. Preferred branched-chain alcohol dehydrogenases are known by the EC number 1.1.1.265, but may also be classified under other alcohol dehydrogenases (specifically, EC 1.1.1.1 or 1.1.1.2). These enzymes utilize NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and/or NADPH as electron donor and are available from a number of sources, including, but not limited to, S. cerevisiae (GenBank Nos: NP — 010656, NC — 001136; NP — 014051, NC — 001145), E. coli (GenBank Nos: NP — 417484 (SEQ ID NO:38), NC — 000913 (SEQ ID NO:37)), and C. acetobutylicum (GenBank Nos: NP — 349892, NC — 003030).
The term “gene” refers to a nucleic acid fragment that is capable of being expressed as a specific protein, optionally including regulatory sequences preceding (5′ non-coding sequences) and following (3′ non-coding sequences) the coding sequence. “Native gene” refers to a gene as found in nature with its own regulatory sequences. “Chimeric gene” refers to any gene that is not a native gene, comprising regulatory and coding sequences that are not found together in nature. Accordingly, a chimeric gene may comprise regulatory sequences and coding sequences that are derived from different sources, or regulatory sequences and coding sequences derived from the same source, but arranged in a manner different than that found in nature. “Endogenous gene” refers to a native gene in its natural location in the genome of an organism. A “foreign” gene refers to a gene not normally found in the host organism, but that is introduced into the host organism by gene transfer. Foreign genes can comprise native genes inserted into a non-native organism, or chimeric genes. A “transgene” is a gene that has been introduced into the genome by a transformation procedure.
As used herein the term “coding sequence” refers to a DNA sequence that codes for a specific amino acid sequence. “Suitable regulatory sequences” refer to nucleotide sequences located upstream (5′ non-coding sequences), within, or downstream (3′ non-coding sequences) of a coding sequence, and which influence the transcription, RNA processing or stability, or translation of the associated coding sequence. Regulatory sequences may include promoters, translation leader sequences, introns, polyadenylation recognition sequences, RNA processing site, effector binding site and stem-loop structure.
The term “promoter” refers to a DNA sequence capable of controlling the expression of a coding sequence or functional RNA. In general, a coding sequence is located 3′ to a promoter sequence. Promoters may be derived in their entirety from a native gene, or be composed of different elements derived from different promoters found in nature, or even comprise synthetic DNA segments. It is understood by those skilled in the art that different promoters may direct the expression of a gene in different tissues or cell types, or at different stages of development, or in response to different environmental or physiological conditions. Promoters which cause a gene to be expressed in most cell types at most times are commonly referred to as “constitutive promoters”. It is further recognized that since in most cases the exact boundaries of regulatory sequences have not been completely defined, DNA fragments of different lengths may have identical promoter activity.
The term “operably linked” refers to the association of nucleic acid sequences on a single nucleic acid fragment so that the function of one is affected by the other. For example, a promoter is operably linked with a coding sequence when it is capable of effecting the expression of that coding sequence (i.e., that the coding sequence is under the transcriptional control of the promoter). Coding sequences can be operably linked to regulatory sequences in sense or antisense orientation.
The term “expression”, as used herein, refers to the transcription and stable accumulation of sense (mRNA) or antisense RNA derived from the nucleic acid fragment of the invention. Expression may also refer to translation of mRNA into a polypeptide.
The term “reduced activity” as it applies to the expression of a protein in a cell host will include those situations where the activity of the protein is diminished as compared with a wildtype form (as with antisense technology for example) or substantially eliminated as with gene disruption, deletion or inactivation for example.
As used herein the term “transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into a host organism, resulting in genetically stable inheritance. Host organisms containing the transformed nucleic acid fragments are referred to as “transgenic” or “recombinant” or “transformed” organisms.
The terms “plasmid” and “vector” refer to an extra chromosomal element often carrying genes which are not part of the central metabolism of the cell, and usually in the form of circular double-stranded DNA fragments. Such elements may be autonomously replicating sequences, genome integrating sequences, phage or nucleotide sequences, linear or circular, of a single- or double-stranded DNA or RNA, derived from any source, in which a number of nucleotide sequences have been joined or recombined into a unique construction which is capable of introducing a promoter fragment and DNA sequence for a selected gene product along with appropriate 3′ untranslated sequence into a cell. “Transformation vector” refers to a specific vector containing a foreign gene and having elements in addition to the foreign gene that facilitates transformation of a particular host cell.
As used herein the term “codon degeneracy” refers to the nature in the genetic code permitting variation of the nucleotide sequence without affecting the amino acid sequence of an encoded polypeptide. The skilled artisan is well aware of the “codon-bias” exhibited by a specific host cell in usage of nucleotide codons to specify a given amino acid. Therefore, when synthesizing a gene for improved expression in a host cell, it is desirable to design the gene such that its frequency of codon usage approaches the frequency of preferred codon usage of the host cell.
The term “codon-optimized” as it refers to genes or coding regions of nucleic acid molecules for transformation of various hosts, refers to the alteration of codons in the gene or coding regions of the nucleic acid molecules to reflect the typical codon usage of the host organism without altering the polypeptide encoded by the DNA.
A “substantial portion” of an amino acid or nucleotide sequence is that portion comprising enough of the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide or the nucleotide sequence of a gene to putatively identify that polypeptide or gene, either by manual evaluation of the sequence by one skilled in the art, or by computer-automated sequence comparison and identification using algorithms such as BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; Altschul, S. F., et al., J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410 (1993)). In general, a sequence of ten or more contiguous amino acids or thirty or more nucleotides is necessary in order to identify putatively a polypeptide or nucleic acid sequence as homologous to a known protein or gene. Moreover, with respect to nucleotide sequences, gene-specific oligonucleotide probes comprising 20-30 contiguous nucleotides may be used in sequence-dependent methods of gene identification (e.g., Southern hybridization) and isolation (e.g., in situ hybridization of bacterial colonies or bacteriophage plaques). In addition, short oligonucleotides of 12-15 bases may be used as amplification primers in PCR in order to obtain a particular nucleic acid fragment comprising the primers. Accordingly, a “substantial portion” of a nucleotide sequence comprises enough of the sequence to specifically identify and/or isolate a nucleic acid fragment comprising the sequence.
As used herein, “substantially similar” enzymes will refer to enzymes belonging to a family of proteins in the art known to share similar structures and function. It is well within the skill of one in the art to identify substantially similar proteins given a known structure. Typical methods to identify substantially similar structures will rely upon known sequence information (nucleotide sequence and/or amino acid sequences) and may include PCR amplification, nucleic acid hybridization, and/or sequence identity/similarity analysis (e.g., sequence alignments between partial and/or complete sequences and/or known functional motifs associated with the desired activity).
A nucleic acid molecule is “hybridizable” to another nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA, or RNA molecule, when a single-stranded form of the nucleic acid molecule can anneal to the other nucleic acid molecule under the appropriate conditions of temperature and solution ionic strength. Given the nucleic acid sequences described herein, one of skill in the art can identify substantially similar nucleic acid fragments that may encode proteins having similar activity. Hybridization and washing conditions are well known and exemplified in Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2001), particularly Chapter 11 and Table 11.1 therein. The conditions of temperature and ionic strength determine the “stringency” of the hybridization. Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments (such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms), to highly similar fragments (such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms). Post-hybridization washes determine stringency conditions. One set of preferred conditions uses a series of washes starting with 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS at room temperature for 15 min, then repeated with 2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 45° C. for 30 min, and then repeated twice with 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 50° C. for 30 min. A more preferred set of stringent conditions uses higher temperatures in which the washes are identical to those above except for the temperature of the final two 30 min washes in 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS was increased to 60° C. Another preferred set of highly stringent conditions uses two final washes in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. An additional set of stringent conditions include hybridization at 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS, 65° C. and washes with 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. followed by 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C., for example.
In one aspect, suitable nucleic acid fragments encode polypeptides that are at least about 70% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. In another aspect, the nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are about 85-90% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. In a further aspect, the nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are at least about 90-100% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Suitable nucleic acid fragments not only have the above homologies but typically encode a polypeptide having at least about 50 amino acids, preferably at least about 100 amino acids, more preferably at least about 150 amino acids, still more preferably at least about 200 amino acids, and most preferably at least about 250 amino acids.
The term “percent identity”, as known in the art, is a relationship between two or more polypeptide sequences or two or more polynucleotide sequences, as determined by comparing the sequences. In the art, “identity” also means the degree of sequence relatedness between polypeptide or polynucleotide sequences, as the case may be, as determined by the match between strings of such sequences. “Identity” and “similarity” can be readily calculated by known methods, including but not limited to those described in: 1.) Computational Molecular Biology (Lesk, A. M., Ed.) Oxford University: NY (1988); 2.) Biocomputing: Informatics and Genome Projects (Smith, D. W., Ed.) Academic: NY (1993); 3.) Computer Analysis of Sequence Data, Part I (Griffin, A. M., and Griffin, H. G., Eds.) Humania: NJ (1994); 4.) Sequence Analysis in Molecular Biology (von Heinje, G., Ed.) Academic (1987); and 5.) Sequence Analysis Primer (Gribskov, M. and Devereux, J., Eds.) Stockton: NY (1991). Preferred methods to determine identity are designed to give the best match between the sequences tested. Methods to determine identity and similarity are codified in publicly available computer programs. Sequence alignments and percent identity calculations may be performed using the Megalign program of the LASERGENE bioinformatics computing suite (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Multiple alignment of the sequences is performed using the Clustal method of alignment (Higgins and Sharp, CABIOS. 5:151-153 (1989)) with default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10), unless otherwise specified. Default parameters for pairwise alignments using the Clustal method are: KTUPLE 1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5.
Suitable nucleic acid fragments (isolated polynucleotides of the present invention) encode polypeptides that are at least about 70% identical, preferably at least about 75% identical, and more preferably at least about 80% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Preferred nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are about 85% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. More preferred nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are at least about 90% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Most preferred are nucleic acid fragments that encode amino acid sequences that are at least about 95% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Suitable nucleic acid fragments not only have the above homologies but typically encode a polypeptide having at least 50 amino acids, preferably at least 100 amino acids, more preferably at least 150 amino acids, still more preferably at least 200 amino acids, and most preferably at least 250 amino acids.
The term “homology” refers to the relationship among sequences whereby there is some extent of likeness, typically due to descent from a common ancestral sequence. Homologous sequences can share homology based on genic, structural, functional and/or behavioral properties. The term “ortholog” or “orthologous sequences” refers herein to a relationship where sequence divergence follows speciation (i.e., homologous sequences in different species arose from a common ancestral gene during speciation). In contrast, the term “paralogous” refers to homologous sequences within a single species that arose by gene duplication. One skilled in the art will be familiar with techniques required to identify homologous, orthologous and paralogous sequences.
The term “sequence analysis software” refers to any computer algorithm or software program that is useful for the analysis of nucleotide or amino acid sequences. “Sequence analysis software” may be commercially available or independently developed. Typical sequence analysis software will include, but is not limited to: 1.) the GCG suite of programs (Wisconsin Package Version 9.0, Genetics Computer Group (GCG), Madison, Wis.); 2.) BLASTP, BLASTN, BLASTX (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410 (1990)); 3.) DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, Wis.); 4.) Sequencher (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Mich.); and 5.) the FASTA program incorporating the Smith-Waterman algorithm (W. R. Pearson, Comput. Methods Genome Res ., [Proc. Int. Symp.] (1994), Meeting Date 1992, 111-20. Editor(s): Suhai, Sandor. Plenum: New York, N.Y.). Within the context of this application it will be understood that where sequence analysis software is used for analysis, that the results of the analysis will be based on the “default values” of the program referenced, unless otherwise specified. As used herein, “default values” will mean any set of values or parameters (as set by the software manufacturer) which originally load with the software when first initialized
Standard recombinant DNA and molecular cloning techniques used here are well known in the art and are described by Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2 nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989 (hereinafter “Maniatis”); and by Silhavy, T. J., Bennan, M. L. and Enquist, L. W. Experiments with Gene Fusions; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1984; and by Ausubel, F. M. et al., In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , published by Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, 1987.
Butanol Tolerance
The invention relates to the discovery that strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are engineered to have a PDR5 gene deletion have increased butanol tolerance. About twenty strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae having deletions of different genes were tested for increased butanol tolerance. The tested strains included those with deletions in different efflux transporters. From this testing it was found that the most improvement in butanol tolerance was in a strain in which the deletion was of the PDR5 gene.
The PDR5 gene encodes a protein (Pdr5p: coding region SEQ ID NO:49 and protein SEQ ID NO:50) that is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter. Pdr5p has efflux pump activity that mediates resistance to many xenobiotic compounds including mutagens, fungicides, steroids, and anticancer drugs. In addition to drug response, Pdr5p is also involved in cation resistance and lipid translocation. Overexpression of Pdr5p results in multidrug resistance (MDR). Loss-of-function mutations in PDR5 create hypersensitivity to a large array of chemically diverse inhibitors because of an inability to cause efflux of such compounds. The finding herein that PDR5 deletion confers increased tolerance to butanol seems to be an opposite effect to this hypersensitive drug response.
In other types of yeasts ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters with multidrug resistance conferring properties are encoded by genes named CDR1 and BFR1. For example, CDR1 is present in Candida albicans (coding region SEQ ID NO:51, protein SEQ ID NO:52), Candida glabrata (coding region SEQ ID NO:53, protein SEQ ID NO:54), Pichia stipitis (coding region SEQ ID NO:55, protein SEQ ID NO:56), and Degaryomces hansenii (coding region SEQ ID NO:57, protein SEQ ID NO:58). For example, BFR1 is present in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (coding region SEQ ID NO:59, protein SEQ ID NO:60).
Reducing or substantially eliminating the activity of protein encoded by the gene endogenous to a yeast cell that may be PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 and that functions as an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter may be used to increase butanol tolerance of the cell. In yeast cells with a genetic modification that inactivates the endogenous PDR5 gene, improved butanol tolerance may be measured through growth yield. Improved growth yield in the presence of butanol varies with the concentration and type of butanol in the growth medium. For example, in 0.625% (w/v) 1-butanol growth yield was 1.4 fold compared to that of the parental non-deleted cells, while in 0.75% (w/v) isobutanol growth yield was 2.7 fold compared to that of the parental non-deleted cells. These results were for a diploid strain. In a haploid yeast grown in 0.75% (w/v) isobutanol, growth yield was 1.8 fold compared to that of the parental non-deleted cells.
Yeast Cells with Reduced Expression of Endogenous ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporter Pdr5p, Cdr1p or Bfr1p
Reduced expression of the endogenous PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 gene to confer reduced Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p activity, respectively, may be engineered in any yeast cell that is amenable to genetic manipulation. Examples include yeasts of Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Hansenula, Candida, Kluyveromyces, Yarrowia and Pichia . Suitable strains include, but are not limited to, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces thermotolerans, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Pichia stipitis and Yarrowia lipolytica . Particularly suitable is Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
In any yeast cell, an endogenous PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 gene, or gene encoding a protein with the same function as the proteins encoded by these genes, may be a target for reduced expression. A gene encoding a protein that performs the same function as Pdr5p encoded by PDR5 may be referred to in the art as a gene with another name including STS1, YDR1, LEM1 and YOR153W. In referring to PDR5 and Pdr5p herein are included genes and their encoded proteins such as these with the same function and high sequence identities. Examples of target genes are those encoding Pdr5p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (coding region SEQ ID NO:49; protein SEQ ID NO:50), Cdr1p from Candida albicans (coding region SEQ ID NO:51, protein SEQ ID NO:52), Candida glabrata (coding region SEQ ID NO:53, protein SEQ ID NO:54), Pichia stipitis (coding region SEQ ID NO:55, protein SEQ ID NO:56), and Degaryomces hansenii (coding region SEQ ID NO:57, protein SEQ ID NO:58), and BFR1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (coding region SEQ ID NO:59, protein SEQ ID NO:60).
Because the sequences of PDR5, CDR1, and BFR1 coding regions and the encoded ABC transporter proteins are known, as exemplified in the SEQ ID NOs listed above and given in Table 4, suitable Pdr5p, Cdr1p, and Bfr1p proteins and their encoding regions may be readily identified by one skilled in the art on the basis of sequence similarity using bioinformatics approaches. Typically BLAST (described above) searching of publicly available databases with known Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p amino acid sequences, such as those provided herein, is used to identify other Pdr5ps, Cdr1ps, or Bfr1ps and their encoding sequences, that may be used as targets in the present strains. These proteins may have at least about 75%-80%, 80-85%, 85%-90%, 90%-95% or 95%-99% sequence identity to any of the Pdr5ps, Cdr1ps or Bfr1p of SEQ ID NOS:50, 52, 54, 56, 58, or 60 while having multidrug resistance ABC transporter activity. Identities are based on the Clustal W method of alignment using the default parameters of GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=0.1, and Gonnet 250 series of protein weight matrix.
In addition to using protein or coding region sequence and bioinformatics methods to identify additional target genes, the sequences described herein or those recited in the art may be used to experimentally identify other homologs in nature. For example each of the of Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p encoding nucleic acid fragments described herein may be used to isolate genes encoding homologous proteins. Isolation of homologous genes using sequence-dependent protocols is well known in the art. Examples of sequence-dependent protocols include, but are not limited to: 1.) methods of nucleic acid hybridization; 2.) methods of DNA and RNA amplification, as exemplified by various uses of nucleic acid amplification technologies [e.g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Mullis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202; ligase chain reaction (LCR), Tabor, S. et al., Proc. Acad. Sci. USA 82:1074 (1985); or strand displacement amplification (SDA), Walker, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89:392 (1992)]; and 3.) methods of library construction and screening by complementation.
For example, genes encoding similar proteins or polypeptides to the Pdr5p, Cdr1p or Bfr1p encoding genes described herein could be isolated directly by using all or a portion of the instant nucleic acid fragments as DNA hybridization probes to screen libraries from any desired organism using methodology well known to those skilled in the art. Specific oligonucleotide probes based upon the disclosed nucleic acid sequences can be designed and synthesized by methods known in the art (Maniatis, supra). Moreover, the entire sequences can be used directly to synthesize DNA probes by methods known to the skilled artisan (e.g., random primers DNA labeling, nick translation or end-labeling techniques), or RNA probes using available in vitro transcription systems. In addition, specific primers can be designed and used to amplify a part of (or full-length of) the instant sequences. The resulting amplification products can be labeled directly during amplification reactions or labeled after amplification reactions, and used as probes to isolate full-length DNA fragments by hybridization under conditions of appropriate stringency.
Typically, in PCR-type amplification techniques, the primers have different sequences and are not complementary to each other. Depending on the desired test conditions, the sequences of the primers should be designed to provide for both efficient and faithful replication of the target nucleic acid. Methods of PCR primer design are common and well known in the art (Thein and Wallace, “The use of oligonucleotides as specific hybridization probes in the Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders”, in Human Genetic Diseases: A Practical Approach , K. E. Davis Ed., (1986) pp 33-50, IRL: Herndon, Va.; and Rychlik, W., In Methods in Molecular Biology , White, B. A. Ed., (1993) Vol. 15, pp 31-39, PCR Protocols: Current Methods and Applications. Humania: Totowa, N.J.).
Generally two short segments of the described sequences may be used in polymerase chain reaction protocols to amplify longer nucleic acid fragments encoding homologous genes from DNA or RNA. The polymerase chain reaction may also be performed on a library of cloned nucleic acid fragments wherein the sequence of one primer is derived from the described nucleic acid fragments, and the sequence of the other primer takes advantage of the presence of the polyadenylic acid tracts to the 3′ end of the mRNA precursor encoding microbial genes.
Alternatively, the second primer sequence may be based upon sequences derived from the cloning vector. For example, the skilled artisan can follow the RACE protocol (Frohman et al., PNAS USA 85:8998 (1988)) to generate cDNAs by using PCR to amplify copies of the region between a single point in the transcript and the 3′ or 5′ end. Primers oriented in the 3′ and 5′ directions can be designed from the instant sequences. Using commercially available 3′ RACE or 5′ RACE systems (e.g., BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.), specific 3′ or 5′ cDNA fragments can be isolated (Ohara et al., PNAS USA 86:5673 (1989); Loh et al., Science 243:217 (1989)).
Alternatively, the described Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p encoding sequences may be employed as hybridization reagents for the identification of homologs. The basic components of a nucleic acid hybridization test include a probe, a sample suspected of containing the gene or gene fragment of interest, and a specific hybridization method. Probes are typically single-stranded nucleic acid sequences that are complementary to the nucleic acid sequences to be detected. Probes are “hybridizable” to the nucleic acid sequence to be detected. The probe length can vary from 5 bases to tens of thousands of bases, and will depend upon the specific test to be done. Typically a probe length of about 15 bases to about 30 bases is suitable. Only part of the probe molecule need be complementary to the nucleic acid sequence to be detected. In addition, the complementarity between the probe and the target sequence need not be perfect. Hybridization does occur between imperfectly complementary molecules with the result that a certain fraction of the bases in the hybridized region are not paired with the proper complementary base.
Hybridization methods are well defined. Typically the probe and sample must be mixed under conditions that will permit nucleic acid hybridization. This involves contacting the probe and sample in the presence of an inorganic or organic salt under the proper concentration and temperature conditions. The probe and sample nucleic acids must be in contact for a long enough time that any possible hybridization between the probe and sample nucleic acid may occur. The concentration of probe or target in the mixture will determine the time necessary for hybridization to occur. The higher the probe or target concentration, the shorter the hybridization incubation time needed. Optionally, a chaotropic agent may be added. The chaotropic agent stabilizes nucleic acids by inhibiting nuclease activity. Furthermore, the chaotropic agent allows sensitive and stringent hybridization of short oligonucleotide probes at room temperature (Van Ness and Chen, Nucl. Acids Res. 19:5143-5151 (1991)). Suitable chaotropic agents include guanidinium chloride, guanidinium thiocyanate, sodium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachloroacetate, sodium perchlorate, rubidium tetrachloroacetate, potassium iodide and cesium trifluoroacetate, among others. Typically, the chaotropic agent will be present at a final concentration of about 3 M. If desired, one can add formamide to the hybridization mixture, typically 30-50% (v/v).
Various hybridization solutions can be employed. Typically, these comprise from about 20 to 60% volume, preferably 30%, of a polar organic solvent. A common hybridization solution employs about 30-50% v/v formamide, about 0.15 to 1 M sodium chloride, about 0.05 to 0.1 M buffers (e.g., sodium citrate, Tris-HCl, PIPES or HEPES (pH range about 6-9)), about 0.05 to 0.2% detergent (e.g., sodium dodecylsulfate), or between 0.5-20 mM EDTA, FICOLL (Pharmacia Inc.) (about 300-500 kdal), polyvinylpyrrolidone (about 250-500 kdal) and serum albumin. Also included in the typical hybridization solution will be unlabeled carrier nucleic acids from about 0.1 to 5 mg/mL, fragmented nucleic DNA (e.g., calf thymus or salmon sperm DNA, or yeast RNA), and optionally from about 0.5 to 2% wt/vol glycine. Other additives may also be included, such as volume exclusion agents that include a variety of polar water-soluble or swellable agents (e.g., polyethylene glycol), anionic polymers (e.g., polyacrylate or polymethylacrylate) and anionic saccharidic polymers (e.g., dextran sulfate).
Nucleic acid hybridization is adaptable to a variety of assay formats. One of the most suitable is the sandwich assay format. The sandwich assay is particularly adaptable to hybridization under non-denaturing conditions. A primary component of a sandwich-type assay is a solid support. The solid support has adsorbed to it or covalently coupled to it immobilized nucleic acid probe that is unlabeled and complementary to one portion of the sequence.
At least one gene encoding Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p may be disrupted in any yeast cell to decrease or substantially eliminate the Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p activity using genetic modification. Many methods for genetic modification of target genes are known to one skilled in the art and may be used to create the present yeast strains. Modifications that may be used to reduce or substantially eliminate expression of a target protein are disruptions that include, but are not limited to, deletion of the entire gene or a portion of the gene, inserting a DNA fragment into the gene (in either the promoter or coding region) so that the protein is not expressed or expressed at lower levels, introducing a mutation into the coding region which adds a stop codon or frame shift such that a functional protein is not expressed, and introducing one or more mutations into the coding region to alter amino acids so that a non-functional or a less enzymatically active protein is expressed. In addition, expression of a gene may be blocked by expression of an antisense RNA or an interfering RNA, and constructs may be introduced that result in cosuppression. In addition, the synthesis or stability of the transcript may be lessened by mutation. Similarly the efficiency by which a protein is translated from mRNA may be modulated by mutation. All of these methods may be readily practiced by one skilled in the art making use of the known or identified coding sequences of the target PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 gene. DNA sequences surrounding coding sequence of the target gene are also useful in some modification procedures and are available for yeasts such as for Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the complete genome sequence coordinated by Genome Project ID9518 of Genome Projects coordinated by NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) with identifying GOPID 13838. Additional examples of yeast genomic sequences include that of Yarrowia lipolytica , GOPIC 13837, and of Candida albicans , which is included in GPID 10771, 10701 and 16373. Additional genomes have been completely sequenced and annotated and are publicly available for the following yeast strains: Candida glabrata CBS 138, Kluyveromyces lactis NRRL Y-1140, Pichia stipitis CBS 6054, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe 972h-.
In particular, DNA sequences surrounding a target coding sequence are useful for modification methods using homologous recombination. For example, in this method flanking sequences are placed bounding a selectable marker gene to mediate homologous recombination whereby the marker gene replaces the target gene. Also partial target gene sequences and flanking sequences bounding a selectable marker gene may be used to mediate homologous recombination whereby the marker gene replaces a portion of the target gene. In addition, the selectable marker may be bounded by site-specific recombination sites, so that following expression of the corresponding site-specific recombinase, the resistance gene is excised from the target gene without reactivating the latter. The site-specific recombination leaves behind a recombination site which disrupts expression of the target gene encoded protein. The homologous recombination vector may be constructed to also leave a deletion in the target gene following excision of the selectable marker, as is well known to one skilled in the art.
Deletions may be made using mitotic recombination as described in Wach et al. ((1994) Yeast 10:1793-1808). This method involves preparing a DNA fragment that contains a selectable marker between genomic regions that may be as short as 20 bp, and which bound a target DNA sequence. This DNA fragment can be prepared by PCR amplification of the selectable marker gene using as primers oligonucleotides that hybridize to the ends of the marker gene and that include the genomic regions that can recombine with the yeast genome. The linear DNA fragment can be efficiently transformed into yeast and recombined into the genome resulting in gene replacement including with deletion of the target DNA sequence (as described in Methods in Enzymology, v 194, pp 281-301 (1991)).
Moreover, promoter replacement methods may be used to exchange the endogenous transcriptional control elements allowing another means to modulate expression such as described in Mnaimneh et al. ((2004) Cell 118(1):31-44) and in Example 12 herein.
In addition, a target gene in any yeast cell may be disrupted using random mutagenesis, which is followed by screening to identify strains with reduced target gene encoded activity. Using this type of method, the DNA sequence of a PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 gene, or any other region of the genome affecting expression of the target gene, need not be known.
Methods for creating genetic mutations are common and well known in the art and may be applied to the exercise of creating mutants. Commonly used random genetic modification methods (reviewed in Methods in Yeast Genetics, 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) include spontaneous mutagenesis, mutagenesis caused by mutator genes, chemical mutagenesis, irradiation with UV or X-rays, or transposon mutagenesis.
Chemical mutagenesis of yeast commonly involves treatment of yeast cells with one of the following DNA mutagens: ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), nitrous acid, diethyl sulfate, or N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitroso-guanidine (MNNG). These methods of mutagenesis have been reviewed in Spencer et al (Mutagenesis in Yeast, 1996, Yeast Protocols: Methods in Cell and Molecular Biology . Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.). Chemical mutagenesis with EMS may be performed as described in Methods in Yeast Genetics, 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light or X-rays can also be used to produce random mutagenesis in yeast cells. The primary effect of mutagenesis by UV irradiation is the formation of pyrimidine dimers which disrupt the fidelity of DNA replication. Protocols for UV-mutagenesis of yeast can be found in Spencer et al (Mutagenesis in Yeast, 1996, Yeast Protocols: Methods in Cell and Molecular Biology . Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.). Introduction of a mutator phenotype can also be used to generate random chromosomal mutations in yeast. Common mutator phenotypes can be obtained through disruption of one or more of the following genes: PMS1, MAG1, RAD18 or RAD51. Restoration of the non-mutator phenotype can be easily obtained by insertion of the wildtype allele. Collections of modified cells produced from any of these or other known random mutagenesis processes may be screened for reduced Pdr5p activity.
In addition, transcription factors regulating PDR5, CDR1, or BFR1 expression may be altered to decrease Pdr5p, Cdr1p, or Bfr1p activity. For example, PDR5 expression is positively regulated by transcription factors Pdr1p and Pdr3p. Decreasing function of these transcription factors may be used to decrease PDR5 expression. PDR5 expression is negatively regulated by transcription factor Rdr1p, and increased function of this transcription factor may be used to decrease PDR5 expression.
Butanol Biosynthetic Pathway
In the present invention, a genetic modification conferring increased butanol tolerance, as described above, is engineered in a yeast cell that is engineered to express a butanol biosynthetic pathway. Either genetic modification may take place prior to the other. The butanol biosynthetic pathway may be a 1-butanol, 2-butanol, or isobutanol biosynthetic pathway.
Suitable biosynthetic pathways are known in the art, and certain suitable pathways are described herein. In some embodiments, the butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises at least one gene that is heterologous to the yeast cell. In some embodiments, the butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises more than one gene that is heterologous to the yeast cell. In some embodiments, the butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises heterologous genes encoding polypeptides corresponding to every step of a biosynthetic pathway.
Likewise, certain suitable proteins having the ability to catalyze the indicated substrate to product conversions are described herein and other suitable proteins are described in the art. For example, US Published Patent Application Nos. US20080261230 and US20090163376, incorporated herein by reference, describe acetohydroxy acid isomeroreductases; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/569,636, incorporated by reference, describes dihydroxyacid dehydratases; an alcohol dehydrogenase is described in US Published Patent Application US20090269823, incorporated herein by reference.
1-Butanol Biosynthetic Pathway
A biosynthetic pathway for the production of 1-butanol that may be used is described by Donaldson et al. in co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US20080182308A1, incorporated herein by reference. This biosynthetic pathway comprises the following substrate to product conversions:
a) acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA, as catalyzed for example by acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:2, 4 or 40 encoded by the genes given as SEQ ID NO:1, 3 or 39; b) acetoacetyl-CoA to 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, as catalyzed for example by 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:6 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:5; c) 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA, as catalyzed for example by crotonase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:8 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:7; d) crotonyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA, as catalyzed for example by butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:10 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:9; e) butyryl-CoA to butyraldehyde, as catalyzed for example by butyraldehyde dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:12 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:11; and f) butyraldehyde to 1-butanol, as catalyzed for example by 1-butanol dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:14 or 16 encoded by the genes given as SEQ ID NO:13 or 15.

The pathway requires no ATP and generates NAD + and/or NADP + , thus, it balances with the central, metabolic routes that generate acetyl-CoA. In some embodiments, the 1-butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises at least one gene, at least two genes, at least three genes, at least four genes, or at least five genes that is/are heterologous to the yeast cell.
2-Butanol Biosynthetic Pathway
Biosynthetic pathways for the production of 2-butanol that may be used are described by Donaldson et al. in co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. US20070259410A1 and US 20070292927A1, each incorporated herein by reference. One 2-butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises the following substrate to product conversions:
a) pyruvate to alpha-acetolactate, as catalyzed for example by acetolactate synthase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:20 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:19; b) alpha-acetolactate to acetoin, as catalyzed for example by acetolactate decarboxylase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:18 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:17; c) acetoin to 2,3-butanediol, as catalyzed for example by butanediol dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:22 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:21; d) 2,3-butanediol to 2-butanone, catalyzed for example by butanediol dehydratase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:24, 26, or 28 encoded by genes given as SEQ ID NO:23, 25, or 27; and e) 2-butanone to 2-butanol, as catalyzed for example by 2-butanol dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:30 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:29.

In some embodiments, the 2-butanol biosynthetic pathway comprises at least one gene, at least two genes, at least three genes, or at least four genes that is/are heterologous to the yeast cell.
Isobutanol Biosynthetic Pathway
Biosynthetic pathways for the production of isobutanol that may be used are described by Maggio-Hall et al. in copending and commonly owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US20070092957 A1, incorporated herein by reference. One isobutanol biosynthetic pathway comprises the following substrate to product conversions:
a) pyruvate to acetolactate, as catalyzed for example by acetolactate synthase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:20 or 42 encoded by genes given as SEQ ID NO:19 or 41; b) acetolactate to 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate, as catalyzed for example by acetohydroxy acid isomeroreductase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:32, 44 or 46 encoded by genes given as SEQ ID NO:31, 43 or 45; c) 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate to α-ketoisovalerate, as catalyzed for example by acetohydroxy acid dehydratase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:34 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:33; or dihydroxyacid dehydratase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:48 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:47; d) α-ketoisovalerate to isobutyraldehyde, as catalyzed for example by a branched-chain keto acid decarboxylase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:36 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:35; and e) isobutyraldehyde to isobutanol, as catalyzed for example by a branched-chain alcohol dehydrogenase with protein sequence such as SEQ ID NO:38 encoded by the gene given as SEQ ID NO:37.

In some embodiments, the isobutanol biosynthetic pathway comprises at least one gene, at least two genes, at least three genes, or at least four genes that is/are heterologous to the yeast cell.
Construction of Yeast Strains for Butanol Production
Any yeast strain that is genetically modified for butanol tolerance as described herein is additionally genetically modified (before or after modification to tolerance) to incorporate a butanol biosynthetic pathway by methods well known to one skilled in the art. Genes encoding the enzyme activities described above, or homologs that may be identified and obtained by commonly used methods, such as those described above, that are well known to one skilled in the art, are introduced into a yeast host. Representative coding and amino acid sequences for pathway enzymes that may be used are given in Tables 1, 2, and 3, with SEQ ID NOs:1-48.
Methods for gene expression in yeasts are known in the art; specifically, basic yeast molecular biology protocols including transformation, cell growth, gene expression, gap repair recombination, etc. are described in Methods in Enzymology , Volume 194, Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology (Part A, 2004, Christine Guthrie and Gerald R. Fink (Eds.), Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. Expression of a gene in yeast typically requires a promoter, followed by the coding region of interest, and a transcriptional terminator, all of which are operably linked to provide expression cassettes. A number of yeast promoters can be used in constructing expression cassettes for genes encoding a butanol biosynthetic pathway, including, but not limited to constitutive promoters FBA, GPD, and GPM, and the inducible promoters GAL1, GAL10, and CUP1. Suitable transcriptional terminators include, but are not limited to FBAt, GPDt, GPMt, ERG10t, and GAL1t. For example, suitable promoters, transcriptional terminators, and the genes of a 1-butanol or isobutanol biosynthetic pathway may be cloned into E. coli -yeast shuttle vectors, as described in Example 2.
Typically used plasmids in yeast are shuttle vectors pRS423, pRS424, pRS425, and pRS426 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.), which contain an E. coli replication origin (e.g., pMB1), a yeast 2μ origin of replication, and a marker for nutritional selection. The selection markers for these four vectors are His3 (vector pRS423), Trp1 (vector pRS424), Leu2 (vector pRS425) and Ura3 (vector pRS426). These vectors allow strain propagation in both E. coli and yeast strains. Typical hosts for gene cloning and expression include a yeast haploid strain BY4741 (MA Ta his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0) (Research Genetics, Huntsville, Ala., also available from ATCC 201388) and a diploid strain BY4743 (MA Ta/alpha his3Δ1/his3Δ1 leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0/LYS2 MET15/met15Δ0 ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0) (Research Genetics, Huntsville, Ala., also available from ATCC 201390). Construction of expression vectors for genes encoding butanol biosynthetic pathway enzymes may be performed by either standard molecular cloning techniques in E. coli or by the gap repair recombination method in yeast.
The gap repair cloning approach takes advantage of the highly efficient homologous recombination in yeast. Typically, a yeast vector DNA is digested (e.g., in its multiple cloning site) to create a “gap” in its sequence. A number of insert DNAs of interest are generated that contain a≧21 by sequence at both the 5′ and the 3′ ends that sequentially overlap with each other, and with the 5′ and 3′ terminus of the vector DNA. For example, to construct a yeast expression vector for “Gene X’, a yeast promoter and a yeast terminator are selected for the expression cassette. The promoter and terminator are amplified from the yeast genomic DNA, and Gene X is either PCR amplified from its source organism or obtained from a cloning vector comprising Gene X sequence. There is at least a 21 by overlapping sequence between the 5′ end of the linearized vector and the promoter sequence, between the promoter and Gene X, between Gene X and the terminator sequence, and between the terminator and the 3′ end of the linearized vector. The “gapped” vector and the insert DNAs are then co-transformed into a yeast strain and plated on the medium containing the appropriate compound mixtures that allow complementation of the nutritional selection markers on the plasmids. The presence of correct insert combinations can be confirmed by PCR mapping using plasmid DNA prepared from the selected cells. The plasmid DNA isolated from yeast (usually low in concentration) can then be transformed into an E. coli strain, e.g. TOP10, followed by mini preps and restriction mapping to further verify the plasmid construct. Finally the construct can be verified by sequence analysis. Yeast transformants of positive plasmids are grown for performing enzyme assays to characterize the activities of the enzymes expressed by the genes of interest.
Fermentation Media
Fermentation media in the present invention must contain suitable carbon substrates. Carbon substrates can include, but are not limited to, monosaccharides such as fructose or galactose, oligosaccharides such as lactose, maltose, or sucrose, polysaccharides such as starch or cellulose or mixtures thereof and unpurified mixtures from renewable feedstocks such as cheese whey permeate, cornsteep liquor, sugar beet molasses, and barley malt. Other carbon substrates can include ethanol, lactate, succinate, or glycerol.
Additionally a carbon substrate can also be one-carbon substrates such as carbon dioxide, or methanol for which metabolic conversion into key biochemical intermediates has been demonstrated. In addition to one and two carbon substrates, methylotrophic organisms are also known to utilize a number of other carbon containing compounds such as methylamine, glucosamine and a variety of amino acids for metabolic activity. For example, methylotrophic yeasts are known to utilize the carbon from methylamine to form trehalose or glycerol (Bellion et al., Microb. Growth C1 Compd., [Int. Symp.], 7th (1993), 415-32, Editor(s): Murrell, J. Collin; Kelly, Don P. Publisher: Intercept, Andover, UK). Similarly, various species of Candida will metabolize alanine or oleic acid (Sulter et al., Arch. Microbiol. 153:485-489 (1990)). Hence it is contemplated that the source of carbon utilized in the present invention can encompass a wide variety of carbon containing substrates and will only be limited by the choice of organism.
Although it is contemplated that all of the above mentioned carbon substrates and mixtures thereof are suitable in the present invention, in some embodiments, a carbon substrates can be glucose, fructose, and sucrose, or mixtures of these with C5 sugars such as xylose and/or arabinose for yeast cells modified to use C5 sugars. Sucrose can be derived from renewable sugar sources such as sugar cane, sugar beets, cassava, sweet sorghum, and mixtures thereof. Glucose can be derived from renewable grain sources through saccharification of starch based feedstocks including grains such as corn, wheat, rye, barley, oats, and mixtures thereof. In addition, fermentable sugars can be derived from renewable cellulosic or lignocellulosic biomass through processes of pretreatment and saccharification, as described, for example, in co-owned and co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 20070031918 A1, which is herein incorporated by reference. Biomass refers to any cellulosic or lignocellulosic material and includes materials comprising cellulose, and optionally further comprising hemicellulose, lignin, starch, oligosaccharides and/or monosaccharides. Biomass can also comprise additional components, such as protein and/or lipid. Biomass can be derived from a single source, or biomass can comprise a mixture derived from more than one source; for example, biomass can comprise a mixture of corn cobs and corn stover, or a mixture of grass and leaves. Biomass includes, but is not limited to, bioenergy crops, agricultural residues, municipal solid waste, industrial solid waste, sludge from paper manufacture, yard waste, wood and forestry waste. Examples of biomass include, but are not limited to, corn grain, corn cobs, crop residues such as corn husks, corn stover, grasses, wheat, wheat straw, barley, barley straw, hay, rice straw, switchgrass, waste paper, sugar cane bagasse, sorghum, soy, components obtained from milling of grains, trees, branches, roots, leaves, wood chips, sawdust, shrubs and bushes, vegetables, fruits, flowers, animal manure, and mixtures thereof.
In addition to an appropriate carbon source, fermentation media must contain suitable minerals, salts, cofactors, buffers and other components, known to those skilled in the art, suitable for the growth of the cultures and promotion of the enzymatic pathway necessary for butanol production.
Culture Conditions
Typically cells are grown at a temperature in the range of about 20° C. to about 37° C. in an appropriate medium. Suitable growth media in the present invention are common commercially prepared media such as broth that includes yeast nitrogen base, ammonium sulfate, and dextrose as the carbon/energy source) or YPD Medium, a blend of peptone, yeast extract, and dextrose in optimal proportions for growing most Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Other defined or synthetic growth media may also be used and the appropriate medium for growth of the particular microorganism will be known by one skilled in the art of microbiology or fermentation science.
Suitable pH ranges for the fermentation are between pH 3.0 to pH 7.5, where pH 4.5.0 to pH 6.5 is preferred as the initial condition.
Fermentations may be performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, where anaerobic or microaerobic conditions are preferred.
The amount of butanol produced in the fermentation medium can be determined using a number of methods known in the art, for example, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography (GC).
Industrial Batch and Continuous Fermentations
The present process employs a batch method of fermentation. A classical batch fermentation is a closed system where the composition of the medium is set at the beginning of the fermentation and not subject to artificial alterations during the fermentation. Thus, at the beginning of the fermentation the medium is inoculated with the desired organism or organisms, and fermentation is permitted to occur without adding anything to the system. Typically, however, a “batch” fermentation is batch with respect to the addition of carbon source and attempts are often made at controlling factors such as pH and oxygen concentration. In batch systems the metabolite and biomass compositions of the system change constantly up to the time the fermentation is stopped. Within batch cultures cells moderate through a static lag phase to a high growth log phase and finally to a stationary phase where growth rate is diminished or halted. If untreated, cells in the stationary phase will eventually die. Cells in log phase generally are responsible for the bulk of production of end product or intermediate.
A variation on the standard batch system is the Fed-Batch system. Fed-Batch fermentation processes are also suitable in the present invention and comprise a typical batch system with the exception that the substrate is added in increments as the fermentation progresses. Fed-Batch systems are useful when catabolite repression is apt to inhibit the metabolism of the cells and where it is desirable to have limited amounts of substrate in the media. Measurement of the actual substrate concentration in Fed-Batch systems is difficult and is therefore estimated on the basis of the changes of measurable factors such as pH, dissolved oxygen and the partial pressure of waste gases such as CO2. Batch and Fed-Batch fermentations are common and well known in the art and examples may be found in Thomas D. Brock in Biotechnology: A Textbook of Industrial Microbiology , Second Edition (1989) Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass., or Deshpande, Mukund V., Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 36:227, (1992), herein incorporated by reference.
Although the present invention is performed in batch mode it is contemplated that the method would be adaptable to continuous fermentation methods. Continuous fermentation is an open system where a defined fermentation medium is added continuously to a bioreactor and an equal amount of conditioned media is removed simultaneously for processing. Continuous fermentation generally maintains the cultures at a constant high density where cells are primarily in log phase growth.
Continuous fermentation allows for the modulation of one factor or any number of factors that affect cell growth or end product concentration. For example, one method will maintain a limiting nutrient such as the carbon source or nitrogen level at a fixed rate and allow all other parameters to moderate. In other systems a number of factors affecting growth can be altered continuously while the cell concentration, measured by media turbidity, is kept constant. Continuous systems strive to maintain steady state growth conditions and thus the cell loss due to the medium being drawn off must be balanced against the cell growth rate in the fermentation. Methods of modulating nutrients and growth factors for continuous fermentation processes as well as techniques for maximizing the rate of product formation are well known in the art of industrial microbiology and a variety of methods are detailed by Brock, supra.
It is contemplated that the present invention may be practiced using either batch, fed-batch or continuous processes and that any known mode of fermentation would be suitable. Additionally, it is contemplated that cells may be immobilized on a substrate as whole cell catalysts and subjected to fermentation conditions for 1-butanol production.
Methods for Butanol Isolation from the Fermentation Medium
The bioproduced butanol may be isolated from the fermentation medium using methods known in the art. For example, solids may be removed from the fermentation medium by centrifugation, filtration, decantation, or the like. Then, the butanol may be isolated from the fermentation medium, which has been treated to remove solids as described above, using methods such as distillation, liquid-liquid extraction, or membrane-based separation. Because butanol forms a low boiling point, azeotropic mixture with water, distillation can only be used to separate the mixture up to its azeotropic composition. Distillation may be used in combination with another separation method to obtain separation around the azeotrope. Methods that may be used in combination with distillation to isolate and purify butanol include, but are not limited to, decantation, liquid-liquid extraction, adsorption, and membrane-based techniques. Additionally, butanol may be isolated using azeotropic distillation using an entrainer (see for example Doherty and Malone, Conceptual Design of Distillation Systems , McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
The butanol-water mixture forms a heterogeneous azeotrope so that distillation may be used in combination with decantation to isolate and purify the butanol. In this method, the butanol containing fermentation broth is distilled to near the azeotropic composition. Then, the azeotropic mixture is condensed, and the butanol is separated from the fermentation medium by decantation. The decanted aqueous phase may be returned to the first distillation column as reflux. The butanol-rich decanted organic phase may be further purified by distillation in a second distillation column.
The butanol may also be isolated from the fermentation medium using liquid-liquid extraction in combination with distillation. In this method, the butanol is extracted from the fermentation broth using liquid-liquid extraction with a suitable solvent. The butanol-containing organic phase is then distilled to separate the butanol from the solvent.
Distillation in combination with adsorption may also be used toisolate butanol from the fermentation medium. In this method, the fermentation broth containing the butanol is distilled to near the azeotropic composition and then the remaining water is removed by use of an adsorbent, such as molecular sieves (Aden et al. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co - Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , Report NREL/TP-510-32438, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, June 2002).
Additionally, distillation in combination with pervaporation may be used to isolate and purify the butanol from the fermentation medium. In this method, the fermentation broth containing the butanol is distilled to near the azeotropic composition, and then the remaining water is removed by pervaporation through a hydrophilic membrane (Guo et al., J. Membr. Sci. 245, 199-210 (2004)).
EXAMPLES
The present invention is further defined in the following Examples. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various uses and conditions.
The meaning of abbreviations is as follows: “s” means second(s), “min” means minute(s), “h” means hour(s), “psi” means pounds per square inch, “nm” means nanometers, “d” means day(s), “μL” means microliter(s), “mL” means milliliter(s), “L” means liter(s), “mm” means millimeter(s), “nm” means nanometers, “mM” means millimolar, “μM” means micromolar, “M” means molar, “mmol” means millimole(s), “μmol” means micromole(s)”, “g” means gram(s), “μg” means microgram(s) and “ng” means nanogram(s), “PCR” means polymerase chain reaction, “OD” means optical density, “OD600” means the optical density measured at a wavelength of 600 nm, “kDa” means kilodaltons, “g” means the gravitation constant, “bp” means base pair(s), “kbp” means kilobase pair(s), “% w/v” means weight/volume percent, % v/v″ means volume/volume percent, “HPLC” means high performance liquid chromatography, and “GC” means gas chromatography
General Methods
Materials and methods suitable for the maintenance and growth of yeast cultures are well known in the art. Techniques suitable for use in the following Examples may be found as set out in Yeast Protocols, Second Edition (Wei Xiao, ed; Humana Press, Totowa, N.J. (2006))). All reagents were obtained from Aldrich Chemicals (Milwaukee, Wis.), BD Diagnostic Systems (Sparks, Md.), Life Technologies (Rockville, Md.), Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, Mo.), or Teknova (Half Moon Bay, Calif.) unless otherwise specified.
YPD contains per liter: 10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone, and 20 g dextrose.
Example 1
Improved Isobutanol Tolerance of S. cerevisiae by Deletion of PDR5 in Diploid Strain
A homozygous diploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing a PDR5 deletion mutation (strain #32409) was obtained from Research Genetics Inc. (Huntsville, Ala.). The deletion strain was made made as part of the Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project described in Winzeler al. (Science, 285:901-906, (1999)).
Strain #32409, renamed S04, was tested for the growth yield as compared with the otherwise isogenic diploid parental strain BY4743 (ATCC #201390) in the presence of several concentrations of isobutanol, as listed in Table 1, in YPD medium. The inoculum OD600 was 0.01. The OD600 of each culture was measured after 24 hours incubation on a roller drum at 30° C. Triplicate cultures of each strain were tested. The average and standard deviation of the 24 hour growth yield measurements in each isobutanol concentration are given in Table 5.





TABLE 5



Average and standard deviations of triplicate measurements of

OD600 of diploid yeast strains with PDR5 deletion and the otherwise

isogenic parental strain after 24 hours incubation with isobutanol.





[Isobutanol] % w/v
BY4743
PDR5 mutant







0
7.77 +/− 0.42
8.08 +/− 0.12

0.25
7.36 +/− 0.04
7.51 +/− 0.11

0.5
6.62 +/− 0.24
7.17 +/− 0.12

0.75
1.84 +/− 0.36
4.91 +/− 0.29

0.825
0.19 +/− 0.03
1.67 +/− 0.13

1
0.08 +/− 0.01
0.16 +/− 0.01































The growth yield for the strain with the PDR5 deletion was substantially greater than that of BY4743 at 0.75% and 0.825% w/v isobutanol (2.7-fold and 8.8-fold, respectively).
Thus, deletion of PDR5 in diploid S. cerevisiae conferred tolerance to isobutanol.
Example 2
Improved Isobutanol Tolerance of S. cerevisiae by Deletion of PDR5 in Haploid Strain
A haploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing a PDR5 deletion mutation (strain #2409) was obtained from Open Biosystems (Huntsville, Ala.) The deletion strain was made as part of the Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project described in Winzeler al. (Science, 285:901-906, (1999)). Strain #2409 was tested for the growth yield as compared with the otherwise isogenic diploid parental strain, BY4741 (ATCC #201388), in the presence of several concentrations of isobutanol in YPD medium. The inoculum OD600 was 0.01. The OD600 of each culture was measured after 24 hours incubation on a roller drum at 30° C. Duplicate cultures of each strain were tested. The average and standard deviation of the 24 hour growth yield measurements in each isobutanol concentration are given in Table 6.





TABLE 6



Average and standard deviations of triplicate measurements of

OD600 of haploid yeast strains with PDR5 deletion and the otherwise

isogenic parental strain after 24 hours incubation with isobutanol.





[Isobutanol] % w/v
BY4741
PDR5 mutant







0
8.93 +/− 0.26
9.16 +/− 0.06

0.75
2.68 +/− 0.07
4.71 +/− 0.53

0.875
0.692 +/− 0.04
2.45 +/− 0.42

1
0.09 +/− 0.02
0.76 +/− 0.13





























The growth yield for the strain with the PDR5 deletion was substantially greater than that of BY4741 at 0.75%, 0.825% and 1% w/v isobutanol (1.8-fold, 3.5-fold, and 8-fold, respectively). Thus, deletion of PDR5 in haploid S. cerevisiae conferred tolerance to isobutanol.
Example 3
Improved 1-Butanol Tolerance of S. cerevisiae by Deletion of PDR5 in Diploid Strain
The homozygous diploid strain of Example 1 containing a PDR5 deletion mutation (obtained from Research Genetics Inc, Huntsville, Ala.) was tested for the growth yield as compared with the otherwise isogenic diploid parental strain BY4743 in the presence of several concentrations of 1-butanol in YPD medium. The inoculum OD600 was 0.01. The OD600 of each culture was measured after 23 hours incubation on a roller drum at 30° C. Triplicate cultures of each strain were tested.
The average and standard deviation of the 23 hour growth yield measurements in each 1-butanol concentration are given in Table 7.





TABLE 7



Average and standard deviations of triplicate measurements of

OD600 of diploid yeast strains with PDR5 deletion and the otherwise

isogenic parental strain after 23 hours incubation with 1-butanol.





[1-Butanol] % w/v
BY4743
PDR5 mutant







0
12.9 +/− 0.10
13.1 +/− 0.20

0.625
2.38 +/− 0.25
3.27 +/− 0.23

0.75
0.30 +/− 0.03
0.40 +/− 0.02

0.875
0.22 +/− 0.01
0.27 +/− 0.01





























The growth yield of the strain with the PDR5 deletion was substantially greater than that of BY4743 at 0.625%, 0.75% and 0.875% w/v 1-butanol (1.4-fold, 1.3-fold, and 1.2-fold, respectively). Thus, deletion of PDR5 in diploid S. cerevisiae conferred tolerance to 1-butanol.
Example 4
Prophetic
Production of Isobutanol in Recombinant S. cerevisiae with Engineered Isobutanol Pathway and Deletion of PDR5
The purpose of this prophetic example is to describe how to enhance isobutanol production in a yeast strain by combining an isobutanol biosynthetic pathway with a PDR5 deletion. The two starting strains are BY4741 and Strain #2409, which is BY4741 carrying a PDR5 deletion.
Construction of vectors pRS423::CUP1p-alsS+FBAp-ILV3 and pHR81::FBAp-ILV5-GPMp-kivD is described in US Patent Publication #US20070092957 A1, Example 17, which is herein incorporated by reference. pRS423::CUP1p-alsS+FBAp-ILV3 has a chimeric gene containing the CUP1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:61), the alsS coding region from Bacillus subtilis (SEQ ID NO: 41), and CYC1 terminator (SEQ ID NO:62) as well as a chimeric gene containing the FBA promoter (SEQ ID NO:63), the coding region of the ILV3 gene of S. cerevisiae (SEQ ID NO:47), and the ADH1 terminator (SEQ ID NO:64). pHR81::FBAp-ILV5+GPMp-kivD is the pHR81 vector (ATCC #87541) with a chimeric gene containing the FBA promoter, the coding region of the ILV5 gene of S. cerevisiae (SEQ ID NO 43), and the CYC1 terminator as well as a chimeric gene containing the GPM promoter (SEQ ID NO:65), the coding region from kivD gene of Lactococcus lactis (SEQ ID NO:35), and the ADH1 terminator. pHR81 has URA3 and leu2-d selection markers.
Plasmid vectors pRS423::CUP1p-alsS+FBAp-ILV3 and pHR81::FBAp-ILV5+GPMp-kivD are transformed into BY4741 or Strain #2409 using standard genetic techniques to yield the doubly transformed strains BY4741-iso and BY4741ΔPDR5-iso, respectively ( Methods in Yeast Genetics, 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).
Aerobic cultures are grown in 250 ml flasks containing 50 ml synthetic complete media lacking histidine and uracil and supplemented with 2% glucose in an Innova4000 incubator (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, N.J.) at 30° C. and 225 rpm. Low oxygen cultures are prepared by adding 45 mL of medium to 60 mL serum vials that are sealed with crimped caps after inoculation and kept at 30° C. Approximately 24 h and 48 h after induction with 0.03 mM CuSO 4 (final concentration), an aliquot of the broth is analyzed by HPLC (Shodex Sugar SH1011 column (Showa Denko America, Inc. NY) with refractive index (RI) detection and GC (HP-Innowax, 0.32 mm×0.25 μm×30 m; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif.) with flame ionization detection (FID) for isobutanol content. Isobutanol is detected. More isobutanol is produced by BY4741ΔPDR5-iso than by BY4741-iso.